Friday, October 30, 2009

Resume

KYLE GRIFFIN 郭贵勤
· 2130 West 7380 South, West Jordan, Utah 84084 · 801.864.4002 ·Kyle.Griffin@aggiemail.usu.edu

OBJECTIVE: Obtain an internship with ASAP Hotel Management Corp.

SKILLS
· Proficient in Mandarin Chinese.
· Excellent reputation with customers as a competent, knowledgeable, and helpful professional.
· Honest, punctual, and reliable.

COURSE PROJECTS
· Performed Market Risk Analysis for companies looking to do business in Southern Asia.
· Provided marketing strategies and consultation for a local company looking to expand into China. Group Project.

EDUCATION
Dual BA International Business and Economics December 2009
Utah State University Jon M. Huntsman School of Business Logan, Utah
· Minor in Mandarin Chinese
· Cumulative GPA 3.92, Major GPA 4.0
Jon M. Huntsman Business Study Abroad Asia Program Summer 2009

EXPERIENCE
Service Assistant May 2008-August 2008
Huish Plaster & Stucco West Jordan, Utah
· Assisted in streamlining inventory supply to specialists.
· Expedited cleanliness and safety of workplace.
Technician May 2007-August 2007
APX Alarms Thousand Oaks, California
· Resolved customer concerns by assessing individual needs on service calls.
· Awarded office bonus for success in providing on-site upgrades to customers.
· Complimented frequently for superior work ethic and efficiency.
· Performed quality installation of security systems.
Research Assistant January 2007-May 2007
University of Utah Bio-Sensing Laboratory Salt Lake City, Utah
· Assisted in multiple experiments by observing and recording results according to scientific protocol.
· Operated in a team structure by assisting graduate students perform research.

VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE
Full-time Service July 2004-August 2006
· Set and accomplished strategic goals daily. Taizhong, Taiwan
· Communicated, taught, and resolved concerns with individuals on a daily basis.
· Provided training on a weekly basis for 10-30 other volunteers.
Financial Clerk August 2008-May 2009
· Processed donations in accordance with standard accounting procedures. Logan, Utah
· Compiled budget reports for organization on a weekly basis.

HONORS/ACTIVITIES
Beta Gamma Sigma, International Business Honor Society, 2009
Recipient, Multiple Academic Scholarships, USU, 2007-2009
Dean’s List, John M. Huntsman School of Business, Fall & Spring 2007-2009
Recipient, 2 A-pin Awards (for academic excellence), USU, Fall & Spring 2007-2009
Eagle Scout, Boy Scouts of America, September 2003

Friday, October 23, 2009

Strategic Sourcing

This weeks topic: Strategic Sourcing
Ideas were taken from:
Getting Offshoring Right by Ravi Aron and Jitendra V. Singh
Strategic Supplier Segmentation: THE New “BESTPRACTICE”IN SUPPLYCHAIN byJeffrey H. Dyer, Dong Sung Cho, Wujin Chu
Strategic Sourcing: To Make or Not To Make by Ravi Venkatesan

As global competition has increased during the past decade, managers have been under tremendous pressure to improve supply chain management as a vehicle through which their organizations can create a competitive advantage. In order for organizations to achieve this advantage, managers must utilize strategic thinking and planning. Strategic thinking is a process that encompasses every aspect of a firm and is critical to increasing firm revenues and value to the end customer. In order to accomplish this, managers must establish a value hierarchy for their corporation. This hierarchy of value allows managers to think strategically about the importance of processes, supplier segmentation, and organizational structure. Systematic review of these core elements will provide key information necessary for managers to make strategic decisions and establish competitive advantage.
In order to create this hierarchy of value, it is imperative that managers have an in-depth knowledge of their company. They must be familiar with the critical nature of their processes in order to make informed decisions. Therefore, managers should establish a standard methodology for differentiating between these internal processes. For example, these processes can be separated into strategic and non-strategic subsystems. First, managers evaluate all internal processes in order to identify “core processes”, “critical processes”, and “commodity processes”. Core processes are classified as strategic in that they are indispensible to the company’s competitive position in the future. Critical and commodity processes are classifiable as non-strategic subsystems. Through differentiating these processes, organizations are able to focus precious resources in developing strategic “core proprietary processes” that can, and must, become the source of competitive advantage. Evaluation of processes provides strategic information, which enables strategic decisions.
The classification of processes as strategic or non-strategic is the foundation of an organization’s value hierarchy. Using this foundation, organizations are then able to make strategic decisions concerning the outsourcing of “non-core” processes. For example, by differentiating processes into strategic and non-strategic subsystems, organizations can choose to subcontract commodity (non-strategic) processes to suppliers better qualified to produce them, while at the same time focusing on core processes and components pivotal to product differentiation. Cummins Engine is an excellent example of an organization that used the value hierarchy to make strategic decisions.
In the 1980’s, Cummins was faced with the need to develop much more advanced piston designs to meet emissions legislation. The investment required to upgrade these processes internally would have been substantial. Moreover, there were several suppliers able to provide better technology at economies of scale. Regardless, Cummins believed that pistons were the very “guts” of their engine; therefore, they were wary about outsourcing this component. To solve this problem, managers at Cummins used the value hierarchy. “Through this objective, data-based analysis, managers at Cummins concluded that pistons were not a core competence. By seeking the most cost-effective source for pistons worldwide, Cummins could now focus organizational energy on building leadership in electronics, ceramics, and alternate fuels-emerging technologies that will shape tomorrow’s competition.” Using the value hierarchy to identify core processes has provided great benefits to Cummins by way of competitive advantage in these emerging technologies.
Another key component required for effective decision making is the ability to identify and manage risk. After using the value hierarchy, organizations looking to outsource commodity processes face operational and structural risks. The ability to make strategic decisions concerning these risks provides an additional competitive advantage to corporations. Operational risk comes from the fact that many service providers will make more errors and execute tasks more slowly than the company’s in-house employees do. This often results in lower customer satisfaction. Structural risk is the risk that service providers may not perform as per original expectations. However, these risks can be mitigated through the organization’s metrics and ability to codify work.
The ability to codify work will decrease operational risk. “When companies document the work that employees do, describe the different situations they face, and stipulate what employees’ responses should be in each scenario, people anywhere in the world can do the job for them. “ Additionally, effective use of metrics reduces structural risk. Only firms that set tolerance limits for error, draw up completion times and productivity norms, and continuously measure employees performance are able to effectively capitalize on outsourcing. “What an organization doesn’t measure, it can’t outsource well.” By analyzing both operational and structural risk, organizations are able to further differentiate processes into: opaque, transparent, codifiable, and non-codifiable processes. This provides more strategic information that managers can use to make effective strategic decisions concerning organizational form and location.
When organizations identify risks of potentially outsourcing a process, they must use strategic planning to decide what location and organizational structure will provide the most value. In the past, managers have had the false impression that outsourcing is an all-or-nothing endeavor. However, there are many options that provide different levels of security for the firm. For example, organizations can: offshore, outsource to service providers, purchase from local suppliers, or enter into joint ventures. With each of these organizational forms, organizations weigh the potential trade-off between internal control and quality with respect to scale economies and gains from specialization offered by suppliers. Through the strategic process of identifying risk, mitigating risk through use of metrics, and weighing all possible options based on this information, organizations can make “better” strategic decisions.
After organizations have a clear understanding of their core processes, inherent risks, and organizational structure; they must use strategic thinking to manage supplier relationships within that structure. In order to manage supplier relations, each supplier should be analyzed strategically to determine the extent to which the supplier’s products contribute to the core competencies and comparative advantage of the buying firm. Based on this information, organizations can use either an arm’s length or partner model to maximize value in their given industry. The arm’s length model is effective in that it minimizes dependence on suppliers and maximizes the bargaining power of the firm. The partner model exhibits better information sharing, coordination, and long term trust based relationships. While both of these models can be effective, firms must think more strategically about supplier management. There is not a one-size-fits-all approach to relationship management. “A company’s ability to strategically segment suppliers in a way as to realize the benefits of both the arm’s length and partner models provides the key to future competitive advantage in supply chain management.”
To achieve the advantages of the arm’s length and partner models, organizations need to manage each supplier relationship irrespective to others. Differentiating between groups of suppliers that provide strategic and non-strategic inputs is critical to managing relationships. For example, supplier that provides strategic inputs must be managed differently from independent suppliers. “Organizations should maintain high levels of communication with these strategic suppliers, provide managerial assistance, exchange personnel, make relation-specific investments, and make every effort to ensure that these suppliers have world-class capabilities.” The best example of effective supplier segmentation is Japanese Automakers. The Japanese utilize a mixture of partners and independent suppliers in order to maximize value and create economies of scale. Each supplier is managed in a way that provides the most value to the home firm.
Strategic thinking is a process that will lead to great success for organizations in the increasingly competitive global market. In order for organizations to gain the full benefits of strategic thinking they must first acquire strategic information. Strategic information comes from evaluation and differentiation of processes, risk management, and organizational form. Strategic information in these areas enables managers to make strategic decisions concerning outsourcing and supplier segmentation management. It is through implementation of strategic decisions that organizations establish competitive advantage and increase value. In order to ensure success, managers must utilize strategic thinking throughout every aspect of the organization.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Supply Chain Dynamics

No one can possibly achieve any real and lasting success or "get rich" in business by being a conformist. Based on class readings and discussions, explain how the above quote relates to the supply chain, and how the way a firm manages its supply chain can be used to differentiate itself from the competition/be a source of competitive advantage.

Harold Sirkin, a Senior Partner in the Boston Consulting Group, once said, “As the economy changes, as competition becomes more global, it’s no longer company vs. company but supply chain vs. supply chain.” Corporations must leverage their supply chains as they compete head-to-head in the business world. In order to have real and lasting success, corporations must leverage their supply chain to differentiate themselves from their competitors. Corporations must create “best value” supply chains, which focus on total value added to the customer. When corporations are content to simply conform to industry norms and the way competition does business, they will lose their ability to create value and have a sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly vital that corporations learn to leverage their core competencies, resources, and the know-how of suppliers to maximize value within their supply chains. This value comes directly by creating a supply chain that facilitates timely sharing of information, reduction in uncertainty, and flexibility.
It is the truth of business that customers and markets are dynamic; therefore, supply chains must also be dynamic to meet their varying demands and preferences. Strategies that were successful yesterday may not be successful tomorrow. As a result, corporations must create a flexible supply chain that reacts to the unpredictable market. Flexibility ensures that the supply chain strategy can support the business in the face of rising volatility. Regardless of industry, all corporations are faced with volatility and uncertainty. Therefore, corporations that are able to establish sustainable competitive advantage must be able to understand and reduce this uncertainty. True market leaders are differentiated from competition by their ability to respond quickly and cost efficiently to changes in both supply and demand. Flexibility can be achieved by promoting: the free flow of information with supplier and customers, the development of collaborative relationships with suppliers, and developing a dependable logistics system.
Seven-Eleven Japan (SEJ) is an example of how a company that builds its’ supply chain on agility, adaptability, and alignment stays ahead of its’ rivals. For example, SEJ has mastered the ability to assimilate market information and disseminate pertinent information to their suppliers. SEJ has invested in a real time system to detect changes in customer preference and track data on sales and consumers at every store.” In addition, even before the internet age began, SEJ had the foresight to further differentiate themselves from competitors by utilizing “satellite connections and ISDN lines to link stores with distributions centers, suppliers, and logistics providers.” SEJ made this incredible investment in both time and capital for the express purpose of adding value to the entire supply chain to better serve their customers.
When discussing value added, it is critical to understand just how a corporation can add value to customers given their industry. SEJ understood that, given their industry, instant demand forecasts and sales data were more vital than reducing costs. The convenience industry is incredibly competitive in terms of cost; however, SEJ realized that decreased lead times in distribution would allow for a competitive advantage. In order to maximize this advantage, SEJ effectively used their communications network to develop collaborative relationships across their supply chain. For example, SEJ successfully aligned its interests with those of its partners by implementing an incentive program that demands consistent resupply of goods in order to meet varying demand projections for different hours of the day. Suppliers were given instant access to sales data, and restock orders were processed multiple times a day. To further expedite the delivery of their products, SEJ established relationships of trust with each distributor. Distributors were expected to be on time with every delivery; however, SEJ trusts that the goods delivered are exactly what they ordered. They do not take inventory on incoming goods; therefore, trucks can continue along their delivery routes with little to no interruption. Thereby, both the goals of the distributors and retailers are in harmony.
Perhaps the greatest example of the strength of SEJ’s flexibility can be seen by their instant response to the earthquake in Kobe, Japan. Within six hours of the earthquake, SEJ was able to use their flexible information system and supplier relationships to provide 64,000 rice balls to the affected areas. SEJ was able to use helicopters, motorcycles, and boats to resupply their stores without delay. While relief trucks were still crawling at two miles an hour on the highway, SEJ was providing goods and services to meet the demands of their customers. SEJ’s flexibility allowed them to provide value to their customers in a quick and cost efficient way.
Perhaps the reason that SEJ has been able to realize such lasting success is that they have not conformed to standard communication protocols used throughout the business arena. In many industries, corporations are remiss to share information with suppliers and partners out of either fear or simply neglect. This stagnation in information flow leads to increased uncertainty throughout the supply chain; uncertainty leads to eventual waste and a reduction of value to the end customer. For example, HP noted that the further down their supply chain they went, the more distorted demand information became. This tremendous inefficiency, known as “The Bullwhip Effect”, led to excess inventories, poor customer service, and lost revenues.
In contrast, clever corporations are able to maximize value in their supply chains with the alignment of information; thereby, all the companies in the supply chain have equal access to forecasts, sales data, and plans. In order to maximize this alignment, corporations must establish an infrastructure that facilitates timely communication of information. In today’s competitive global markets, major corporations understand the key role of information in long term success. Many corporations are excellent at tracking data; however, in order to achieve lasting success corporations must be able to use information in a way that provides the most value in their given industry.
One example of a corporation that understands how to use information to create a best value supply chain is World Corporation. World Corporation does business in the highly volatile fashion industry. Demand for high fashion products has extremely high seasonal variability. Therefore, World Corp’s success is predicated on the timely tracking of customer demand. Many corporations rely solely on historical data to forecast demand. In contrast, World Corporation has differentiated itself and thereby created real and lasting success through their ability to employ not only historical data but also early sales data to continually update original demand forecasts. Their ability to continually forecast gives them great power to postpone production of goods with unpredictable demand patterns. World Corp. shares this information with suppliers to reduce uncertainty across the breadth of the supply chain. Updated forecasting also allows World Corp. to increase value in the supply chain by reducing lead times on products. Thus, the entire information network is used to get products to the market faster and thereby maximize profitability.
Another example of a corporation that has used information to set itself apart from the competition is Starbucks. Starbucks created competitive advantage in the fast food industry by combining diverse pools of knowledge to reinvent the way a cup of coffee was sold. They did this by utilizing Italian technology for espresso coffee, the European concept of the Café, and U.S. expertise in retail chains to set them apart from industry norms. Whereas other competitors in the fast food industry, such as McDonalds, have run into problems trying to enter global markets without harnessing the power of diversity, Starbucks has become an industry leader.
Because markets are uncertain corporations must be willing to adapt to the market and external environment. X-Box is a great example of a company that was able harness the power of flexibility in direct consequence to market information. In the past, many corporations in the gaming industry had used outsourcing as a method to attempt to become the low cost leader in their industry. This attempt to gain a competitive advantage resulted in sending production of the system to areas far away from major potential markets. Microsoft executives were convinced that the Christmas season sales of their product would provide them with a large market share and high profit. However, as the Christmas season drew closer, Microsoft became unsure about the viability of producing the X-Box in China and getting it to market in time for the season. Therefore, Microsoft went against industry norms by moving production of the X-Box to a higher cost area. However, this move provided increased value by allowing greater speed in distribution. As a result, Microsoft was able to get the X-Box to market for the Christmas Season and gained a large market share. Microsoft was able to use the agility of its supply chain as a competitive weapon.
Microsoft, Seven Eleven, World Corporation, and Starbucks are all examples of how a corporation can use their supply chain to create competitive advantages and enhance firm performance. Supply chains that facilitate timely sharing of information, reduction in uncertainty, and flexibility of processes have caught the vision of not conforming, but leading. As these corporations have used their supply chains to differentiate themselves from their competitors, they have provided real value to their customers. Providing this value is the only way to obtain real and lasting success.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Supply Chain Design

Today's topic: Supply Chain Design
Articles for discussion:
Avon Gets Its' (Supply Chain) Makeover: Shoshanan Cohen
Aligning Supply Chain Strategies With Product Uncertainty: Hau L Lee
Mass Customization at Hewlett-Packard; The Power of Postponement: Feitzinger
Making Supply Meet Demand in an Uncertain World: Marshall L. Fisher

The global business environment is filled with opportunity; however, it is also fraught with risk. Expanding product variety, short product life cycles, faster product development, and global competition threaten to decrease corporate revenues. Corporations that fail to adapt to these changes in the market environment will quickly be left behind. Therefore, implementation of effective supply chain management is critical for organizations to maintain and improve a corporation’s competitive edge. Efficient management of supply chain complexity is a task that requires intense effort and planning. In order to maximize supply chain effectiveness, managers must be masters in the field of information gathering, evaluation, and transmission.
These three skills culminate in the ability to understand and reduce market uncertainty. Serious stumbling blocks to supply chains are: the ever present uncertainty involving consumer demand, the inconsistency of suppliers, and individual product uncertainty. Therefore, managers need to be aware of the demand characteristics of the products they specialize in. This knowledge will allow managers to effectively reduce uncertainty. Managers should ask themselves: Are the products offered by the corporation functional or innovative products? Are supply characteristics stable or evolving? Where is the product in the overall product-life cycle? These questions are incredibly significant because they provide reference for managers to implement appropriate supply chain strategies.
Managers need to have a system in place to gather demand information from the market. Innovations in Information Technology are transforming the gathering of market information. With the internet, companies in a supply chain can be connected in real time with information and knowledge shared continuously; new products and services can be designed to fit special market segments; and new supply chain structures can be developed to serve customers in a more direct manner. In addition to the internet, information sharing and tight coordination with suppliers and customers will increase control of supply chain efficiency. Corporations can implement synchronized planning with suppliers; engage in joint replenishment programs; and involve suppliers in early design collaboration. These methods give managers more information upon which to base strategic decisions.
For example, Avon, in its’ corporate restructuring, learned that decentralized business models did not provide the needed information from the market. Therefore, Avon implemented centralized and regionalized planning groups in order to gain real-time demand information. In another example, Black & Decker lost tens of millions of dollars one year because they were unable to predict pertinent demand information. They were unable to meet “exacting market requirements with their traditional planning methods;” therefore, top managers have attempted to make plans fast and flexible so that the company can respond to rapid changes in market preferences. These corporations have learned that, in order to be successful, they must obtain all pertinent information, analyze it, and transmit goals and plans throughout the company.
Given the significance of information flow and synthesis, companies also try to reduce uncertainty through forecasting. Perhaps the best example of effective forecasting is Sport Obermeyer. Sport Obermeyer has implemented a strategy known as accurate response to reduce uncertainty in forecasted demand. Accurate response relies on finding out what forecasters can and cannot forecast well. Managers learn those products for which demand is relatively predictable or unpredictable (functional/innovative products). Armed with this information, they are able to make the supply chain more flexible so that managers can postpone decisions about their most unpredictable items until they have some market signals, such as early-season sales results, to help correctly match supply with demand. They also employ risk-based production sequencing, which allows them to be as responsive to the market as possible in the areas where the payoffs are the greatest. Sport Obermeyer exemplifies a key message of these readings. They have learned that extreme effort in information gathering and forecasting can result in supply chain maximization and sustainability.
Another key concept can be examined through Sport Obermeyer’s accurate response system. This system is structured to take into account missed sales opportunities; as well as, reduce them through a process of shortening lead times by standardization of products. Standardization and mass customization of products can lead to greater supply chain efficiency. Mass customization effectively requires postponing the tasks of differentiating a product for a specific customer until the latest possible point in the supply chain. Hewlett-Packard is perhaps the greatest example of how postponement, as per design of the supply chain, can revolutionize business strategy. HP has declared that this strategy of postponement has given them “unparalleled flexibility and responsiveness to customers’ demands.”
This flexibility comes directly from an integration of the designs of their products; the processes used to make and deliver those products; and the configuration of the entire supply chain network. Products are standardized according to a modular product design, thereby allowing independent modules to be assembled into different forms of the product easily and inexpensively. Additionally, by postponing final assembly to distribution centers, HP has allowed for quicker response to customer demands. Not only do the distribution centers customize the product, they also purchase the materials that differentiate it. This thereby cuts transportation costs and decreases lead time. HP has gained great benefits from postponing the assembly of their universal power supply. The process of standardization and postponement can also be seen in other industries. Avon has standardized their basic bottles, and postponed the addition of multi-language labels until demand is forecast at each distribution facility. Paint products and garment manufacturing are also maximizing supply chain efficiency through the process of postponement. By so doing, they also “save on transportation and duty costs and greatly increase return on assets.”
The last key theme, which encompasses all the articles, can be summarized as “seeing the end from the beginning”. It was only when Avon stepped back and looked at the supply chain as an “end-to-end process” that the true benefits became clear. In order for managers to see the end from the beginning, collaboration is critical. Avon felt collaboration was so important that they removed 45 of their top tier employees from their regular jobs in order to increase collaboration. These people were placed in “design workshops” wherein the knowledge of everyone in the company could be used to improve supply chain design. Involving employees from the loading dock provided wonderful innovation about packaging and the logistics of loading Avon products. Without this type of inter-corporation collaboration, corporations will miss out of incredible opportunities to improve.
Hewlett-Packard also implemented a similar strategy of inter-corporation collaboration. Representatives from Marketing, R&D, Manufacturing and Distribution, Finance, and Management are required to meet together and discuss supply chain maintenance. As a result, each sector has full knowledge of the needs and capabilities of other sectors within the corporation. This level of communication is not only critical within the corporation; it must also extend to suppliers. Obermeyer Sport stated that, “ensuring access to the right supplies requires extensive discussions with suppliers to find a way to meet both parties’ needs.” Communication and collaboration will streamline the supply chain to reduce production and distribution lead times.
In conclusion, corporations must accurately forecast, efficiently collaborate, and effectively communicate information across the breadth of the supply chain. As a result, corporations can reduce both market uncertainty and streamline supply chain efficiency. Moreover, corporations that exert the effort to align goals and information across the “end-to-end” supply chain will satisfy their customers’ needs and increase their profit margins.